That's a lie, clearly. I could never own too many books, but it is overwhelming trying to move and unpack and find space for all of them. I have several shelves and spaces for books in my room, and I still end up stacking them on top of one another and hoping that my reading pile next to my bed doesn't get too high. I've often wondered what people would think if they could see my bookshelves. What type of reader do I seem to be? Am I a snob because I have one shelf for my Harry Potter books (all hardcover) and I keep my literary analysis and criticism books on a shelf? Is it pretentious that I saved all my 'classics' from college -- with the exception, of course, of those few books I despised... and my Shakespeare collection, which was a pointless purchase because that class was a joke and you can find all of his plays in the full-text online (I can't lie, I sold it back mid-semester for alcohol money. Sorry, mom).
I'm of the opinion that a bookshelf can tell you more about a person than a fingerprint. No, I can't trace your identity back to your bookshelf, but the books a person owns -- and the way they are organized -- is a key way to a person's inner-self. No bookshelf? That can tell you something, too. As I slowly unpack and organize my books, I'm realizing the way they are organized is important to me. Although I'm slightly OCD in some ways -- my closet, for example, is organized by color. My shirts hang white to black, my dresses and skirts and pants on the opposite side of the closet. My make-up is organized inside the top drawer of my dresser. My room, right now, is a disaster, but I feel like that comes with moving. My bookshelf, however, is not organized in any logical way to the outside observer. But for me, it's a chaos that makes sense. Once everything is unpacked, I'm going to do a post on my shelves, pictures and all. I'm a technological genius!
How do you organize your books?
July 26, 2011
July 18, 2011
Wine for Dummies: my 'light' summer reading
I've almost -- keyword being almost -- resigned myself to the fact that I may not get through all of my books before the year is up. I'm almost -- again, I'm not sure how I feel about using that word -- okay with that, as long as I continue reading. The reason I'm almost okay with it is because I've had to add additional books to my list for a variety of reasons. Right now? Wine for Dummies, from the lovely _________ for Dummies collection. Whoever came up with that idea (and who was first? _____ for Dummies or The Idiots Guide to _______?) is probably rolling in money at this point.
Anyway, I finally got a job. No, it's not a teaching job. But I got a job at a wine place in the area where I'll be selling wine (and other goodies) as well as doing tastings. Now, if you knew me in college, you'll know that my wine experience is limited to boxed wine (tour de Franzia, anyone?) and Yellowtail (mmmm, Shiraz). Apparently that's okay. I've been tasting the wines, and I was given a homework assignment of sorts. Reading!
I'm a nerd. We all know this. So I'm already on chapter 5 of the 21 chapter book, and the teacher in me is having a field-day. I'm noticing all the non-fiction text features I've taught my students to recognize! It's been a while since I've done the non-fiction thing, exceptions being, of course, memoirs and essays. It's odd; I'm trying to finish The Watsons go to Birmingham:1963, but I think when I'm done with my wine education I'll go on to another non-fiction book, since I'll already be in the mindset.
I don't mind non-fiction, but I find I always feel like I should be taking notes or preparing for a quiz. I find it difficult to escape the student/teacher inside my head as I'm reading, and I constantly find myself rereading and fact checking. Not nearly as fun as reading a work of fiction.
I did learn about how wine bottles are labeled, though! I think I'm a nerd...
Anyway, I finally got a job. No, it's not a teaching job. But I got a job at a wine place in the area where I'll be selling wine (and other goodies) as well as doing tastings. Now, if you knew me in college, you'll know that my wine experience is limited to boxed wine (tour de Franzia, anyone?) and Yellowtail (mmmm, Shiraz). Apparently that's okay. I've been tasting the wines, and I was given a homework assignment of sorts. Reading!
I'm a nerd. We all know this. So I'm already on chapter 5 of the 21 chapter book, and the teacher in me is having a field-day. I'm noticing all the non-fiction text features I've taught my students to recognize! It's been a while since I've done the non-fiction thing, exceptions being, of course, memoirs and essays. It's odd; I'm trying to finish The Watsons go to Birmingham:1963, but I think when I'm done with my wine education I'll go on to another non-fiction book, since I'll already be in the mindset.
I don't mind non-fiction, but I find I always feel like I should be taking notes or preparing for a quiz. I find it difficult to escape the student/teacher inside my head as I'm reading, and I constantly find myself rereading and fact checking. Not nearly as fun as reading a work of fiction.
I did learn about how wine bottles are labeled, though! I think I'm a nerd...
July 11, 2011
Leah goes to Alaska; the Watsons go to Birmingham!
And another month passes; where does the time go? I'm getting to the end of the wire for my little experiment, but I did finish a few more books since my last update. Our entire family (and I mean entire family... grammie and her sister took all the kids and grandkids on a cruise) went to Alaska last week. It was fantastic, but I didn't read on the plane like I thought I would. I don't travel well, and instead of passing the time with a book, I found watching a movie and TV was more distracting from the plane. I did get through a few books on the boat; I read on the bus that took up to Anchorage at the end of the trip, and I spent some time reading on our balcony. I finished Grendel and Waiting for Godot, and in the time before the trip, I spent 2 days down the shore and reading Nineteen Minutes.
Let me begin by saying I have a freakish obsession with Beowulf. It's odd, really. The Seamus Heaney translation is stellar, and I actually audited a class in college called Beowulf to Mallory (audited... you know, where you take a class but not for a grade. Yeah, I was that loser who took too many credits that semester but couldn't stand to NOT read Beowulf again). I loved the perspective of the monster, and I'm glad I read Beowulf just 3 years ago [recently enough] -- and talked to my co-worker about his teaching the novel -- to remember small plot details that make their way into the story-line. Think Wicked, told from the point of view of the Wicked Witch, but a million times better. Grendel isn't completely innocent; instead he seems very human, aside from him actually being a monster and eating people, and longs for a life away from his mother. I read it on my kindle, which I'm still not completely sold on, and I think it would have been even better to read it alongside Beowulf. I have Wide Sargasso Sea on my reading list as well, which is a complementary tale to Jane Eyre, and having read that again just a year ago, I'm hoping it will be even more interesting.
Waiting for Godot took about 2 hours, while I was waiting (hahaha see what I did there?) for the time to arrive to go on a dog-sledding tour of a glacier. I sat in a deck chair on the covered part of the pool (hey, it's cold and rainy in Alaska and you have to swim inside!) and ate some ice cream while I read. It was nice, although there was an Asian family playing ping-pong who kept looking at me and pointing. I'm not sure why. It may have been my polka-dotted rainboots worn indoors, but who knows!
Waiting for Godot is absurd and meant to be absurd, and although I enjoyed it, I don't see it as an important part of my personal literary canon. I brought it up in conversation recently and a shall-remain-nameless-person critiqued my not loving the play and 'told' me (I already knew, thank you) that it was absurdest comedy and that's why it was so odd.
Yeah, I'm aware. But thanks!
Okay, here's the thing. I'm pretentious and obnoxious and a former English major. I read, and I read a lot. I have my likes and my dislikes, and people who don't read really bother me. But it's people who have only read a few things and act like he -- I do really wish English had a gender neutral pronoun -- is the highest of literary critics that drive me up a wall. Extra points if the few things he has read are of the pretentious circle. The conversation goes something like this:
"Oh, Stephen King, he's so overrated. He simply writes to sell books."
"Well, he's written quite a bit under pseudonyms, and he's dabbled in novels, short stories, poetry, and screenplays, so I'd say he's a well-rounded and accessible author."
"Yes, I suppose, but he's no Gabriel Garcia Marquez. I mean, One Hundred Years of Solitude? Amazing."
"Uh-huh. And what did you think of his other books? Did you enjoy his use of magic realism?"
Generally the conversation ends somewhere in the range, with me doing my best to escape the conversation and the other person realizing they've engaged an English teacher in a book discussion. That can be scary; we get overly excited about things. But I digress; do you know why I haven't really read Marquez? Because I find him difficult and somewhat boring, and that is the beauty of my study of literature. I read books because I want to be entertained and amazed. Why else would I read everything Anne Rice has ever written? Although I will argue until the day I die the literary merit of her works. Don't play.
The point is, I promise I've been reading -- just today I was reading The Watsons go to Birmingham -- 1963 in the bathtub, but that's for another post.
I want to know this: what is the most pretentious book you've ever read? What book/author do you find most obnoxious people have read and want to tell you they've read?
Let me begin by saying I have a freakish obsession with Beowulf. It's odd, really. The Seamus Heaney translation is stellar, and I actually audited a class in college called Beowulf to Mallory (audited... you know, where you take a class but not for a grade. Yeah, I was that loser who took too many credits that semester but couldn't stand to NOT read Beowulf again). I loved the perspective of the monster, and I'm glad I read Beowulf just 3 years ago [recently enough] -- and talked to my co-worker about his teaching the novel -- to remember small plot details that make their way into the story-line. Think Wicked, told from the point of view of the Wicked Witch, but a million times better. Grendel isn't completely innocent; instead he seems very human, aside from him actually being a monster and eating people, and longs for a life away from his mother. I read it on my kindle, which I'm still not completely sold on, and I think it would have been even better to read it alongside Beowulf. I have Wide Sargasso Sea on my reading list as well, which is a complementary tale to Jane Eyre, and having read that again just a year ago, I'm hoping it will be even more interesting.
Waiting for Godot took about 2 hours, while I was waiting (hahaha see what I did there?) for the time to arrive to go on a dog-sledding tour of a glacier. I sat in a deck chair on the covered part of the pool (hey, it's cold and rainy in Alaska and you have to swim inside!) and ate some ice cream while I read. It was nice, although there was an Asian family playing ping-pong who kept looking at me and pointing. I'm not sure why. It may have been my polka-dotted rainboots worn indoors, but who knows!
Waiting for Godot is absurd and meant to be absurd, and although I enjoyed it, I don't see it as an important part of my personal literary canon. I brought it up in conversation recently and a shall-remain-nameless-person critiqued my not loving the play and 'told' me (I already knew, thank you) that it was absurdest comedy and that's why it was so odd.
Yeah, I'm aware. But thanks!
Okay, here's the thing. I'm pretentious and obnoxious and a former English major. I read, and I read a lot. I have my likes and my dislikes, and people who don't read really bother me. But it's people who have only read a few things and act like he -- I do really wish English had a gender neutral pronoun -- is the highest of literary critics that drive me up a wall. Extra points if the few things he has read are of the pretentious circle. The conversation goes something like this:
"Oh, Stephen King, he's so overrated. He simply writes to sell books."
"Well, he's written quite a bit under pseudonyms, and he's dabbled in novels, short stories, poetry, and screenplays, so I'd say he's a well-rounded and accessible author."
"Yes, I suppose, but he's no Gabriel Garcia Marquez. I mean, One Hundred Years of Solitude? Amazing."
"Uh-huh. And what did you think of his other books? Did you enjoy his use of magic realism?"
Generally the conversation ends somewhere in the range, with me doing my best to escape the conversation and the other person realizing they've engaged an English teacher in a book discussion. That can be scary; we get overly excited about things. But I digress; do you know why I haven't really read Marquez? Because I find him difficult and somewhat boring, and that is the beauty of my study of literature. I read books because I want to be entertained and amazed. Why else would I read everything Anne Rice has ever written? Although I will argue until the day I die the literary merit of her works. Don't play.
The point is, I promise I've been reading -- just today I was reading The Watsons go to Birmingham -- 1963 in the bathtub, but that's for another post.
I want to know this: what is the most pretentious book you've ever read? What book/author do you find most obnoxious people have read and want to tell you they've read?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)